Newsroom
Minnesota Court Considers Fair Congressional, State Legislative Maps Proposed by NRAF-Supported Voters
Today, a special state court panel held oral arguments in the ongoing impasse lawsuit, Sachs v. Simon, which establishes that Minnesota’s current congressional and state legislative districts have not been updated based on 2020 Census data, and, therefore, new maps must be drawn by the court.
NRAF-Supported Pennsylvania Voters Ask State Supreme Court to Act Quickly to Ensure Fair Elections
Today, voters supported by the National Redistricting Action Fund (NRAF) filed an Application for Extraordinary Relief to the Pennsylvania Supreme Court as part of the impasse lawsuit filed in the Commonwealth Court last week.
Pennsylvania Voters File Impasse Lawsuit with Support of the National Redistricting Action Fund
In a petition today to the Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, voters supported by the National Redistricting Action Fund (NRAF) filed a lawsuit asking the court to step in to draw the state’s new congressional districts.
Ohio Voters Supported by NRAF File Merits Brief Detailing Egregious Republican Gerrymander
In a submission today to the Ohio Supreme Court, 12 Ohio voters, supported by the National Redistricting Action Fund (NRAF), filed their merits brief as part of their lawsuit, Adams v. DeWine, asking the court to strike down the newly-enacted congressional map as a partisan gerrymander in violation of Article XIX of the Ohio Constitution, which bans maps that unduly favor or disfavor a political party or its incumbents.
Minnesota Voters Propose Fair Congressional, State Legislative Maps for Court’s Consideration
In a submission today to a special redistricting panel in state court, Minnesota voters supported by the National Redistricting Action Fund (NRAF) filed motions to adopt congressional and state legislative plans as part of the ongoing impasse lawsuit. . .